Lee v. Superior Court

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 1108·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1560·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 712
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2009G041511California9,679 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

INTRODUCTION

The Orange County District Attorney’s Office (the district attorney) initiated separate proceedings against Richard Allen Lee, John Patrick Semeneck, Ross William Rabuck, Jr., Robert Eldred Morehead, and William Sabatasso (collectively, defendants) by filing a petition against each defendant seeking his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) (SVPA). (All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise specified.) The trial court denied defendants’ respective (and essentially identical) motions to quash subpoenas duces tecum issued by the district attorney to Coalinga State Hospital (CSH), the California Men’s Colony, and the “Health Records Center.” The subpoenas sought a wide range of information including medical and psychological records, trust account information, and visitor logs.

Each defendant filed a petition for writ of prohibition/mandate in this court, arguing the trial court (1) exceeded its jurisdiction in ordering compliance with the subpoenas because they “lack[ed] affidavits showing specific facts justifying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.