ST

S.T. v. Superior Court

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 1009·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2009B216686California979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Petitioner, S.T. (father), an incarcerated parent, seeks an extraordinary writ to vacate the orders of the juvenile court issued at a contested six-month review hearing terminating his reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing as to his daughter, J.T. Father maintains that the court erred in believing that it had no discretion to continue services and in finding that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) had provided him with reasonable services. The DCFS and counsel for the minor agree that there would be no detriment to the minor from continuing reunification services and therefore they do not oppose the requested relief. They assert, however, that the department did provide father with reasonable reunification services.

We will grant a writ directing the trial court to vacate its order and to reconsider continuing reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing in accordance with the views expressed in this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The facts are undisputed.

J.T. was bom in September 2008 and detained at birth because she exhibited exposure to methamphetamine and both her father…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.