Wences

Wences v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 305·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1477·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 199·29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1359
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 2009B208525California4,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Appellant Cesar Wences (Wences) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandate brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Wences, a police officer, received an official reprimand from the Los Angeles Police Department (the Department) for using unauthorized tactics and inappropriately drawing his weapon during the course of an off-duty, officer-involved shooting. After his administrative appeal was denied, Wences filed a mandate petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court, seeking an order compelling respondents City of Los Angeles and Chief of Police William J. Bratton (collectively Respondents) to set aside the official reprimand and the sustained charges of misconduct against him. The trial court denied the petition on the grounds that there was substantial evidence to support the administrative decision. We conclude, however, that because the disciplinary proceedings against Wences substantially affected his fundamental vested right in his employment, the trial court was required to exercise its independent judgment on the evidence. We therefore reverse and remand the matter to the trial court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.