Tichinin

Tichinin v. City of Morgan Hill

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 1049·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1557·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 661
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2009H031019California15,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rushing, J.

I. Statement of the Case

In 2004, the Morgan Hill City Council adopted a resolution that condemned Bruce Tichinin, a local attorney, for hiring a private investigator to conduct surveillance of the city manager and then denying that he had done so. Thereafter, Tichinin filed an action against the city under 42 United States Code section 1983 (hereafter 1983 action) alleging that the city unlawfully retaliated against him for exercising his constitutional rights. The city answered and then filed an anti-SLAPP motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 to strike the action. (Bradbury v. Superior Court (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1108, 1117-1118 [ 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ] [§425.16 applies to federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ]; accord, Vergos v. McNeal (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1387, 1392, fn. 4 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.3d 647 ].) After a hearing, the trial court granted the anti-SLAPP motion, struck the amended complaint, awarded the city attorney fees, and entered judgment.

On appeal, Tichinin claims the court erred in granting the motion.

We agree and reverse the judgment.

II. Background

In 2002, a rumor circulated in the City of Morgan Hill (City) that J. Edward Tewes (Tewes),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.