Tichinin
Tichinin v. City of Morgan Hill
Opinion
Opinion
Rushing, J.
I. Statement of the Case
In 2004, the Morgan Hill City Council adopted a resolution that condemned Bruce Tichinin, a local attorney, for hiring a private investigator to conduct surveillance of the city manager and then denying that he had done so. Thereafter, Tichinin filed an action against the city under 42 United States Code section 1983 (hereafter 1983 action) alleging that the city unlawfully retaliated against him for exercising his constitutional rights. The city answered and then filed an anti-SLAPP motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 to strike the action. (Bradbury v. Superior Court (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1108, 1117-1118 [ 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ] [§425.16 applies to federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ]; accord, Vergos v. McNeal (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1387, 1392, fn. 4 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.3d 647 ].) After a hearing, the trial court granted the anti-SLAPP motion, struck the amended complaint, awarded the city attorney fees, and entered judgment.
On appeal, Tichinin claims the court erred in granting the motion.
We agree and reverse the judgment.
II. Background
In 2002, a rumor circulated in the City of Morgan Hill (City) that J. Edward Tewes (Tewes),…