Burlage

Burlage v. Superior Court

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 166·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 142
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2009B211431California3,090 words

Opinion

Opinion

Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, John A. Taylor, Jr.; Lang, Hanigan & Carvalho, John D. Lang; Smith Law Firm and Craig R. Smith for Real Party in Interest.

Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Robert A. Olson for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.

GILBERT, P. J.—

It is not often that a trial court vacates an arbitration award and an appellate court affirms the order. We shall explain why that happened here, but first:

We look to legal precedent in deciding cases. We believe the law is predictable and provides litigants and counsel a reasonable degree of certainty. True, but not always.

In 1991, we wrote what we thought was a routine arbitration opinion. ( Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (Apr. 2, 1991, B048936) [nonpub. opn.].) We relied on decades of precedent in our unpublished decision to affirm the arbitration award because no error appeared on the face of the award. In dicta, we noted that had the error appeared on the face of the award and created substantial prejudice, we would have reversed.

To our surprise, our Supreme Court granted review. Our holding was affirmed, but our dicta "reversed." ( Moncharsh…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.