In Re Mark B.

Good Law
149 Cal. App. 4th 61·56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2007C049885, C050371California7,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

Law Office of Julie Lynn Wolff and Julie Lynn Wolff, Sacramento, for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Weintraub Genshlea Chediak, Thadd A. Blizzard and Charles L. Post, Sacramento, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Robert A. Ryan, Jr., County Counsel and Lilly C. Frawley, Deputy County Counsel as Amicus Curiae for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION. [*]

SIMS, Acting P.J.

"Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7 provides that the riling of a pleading certifies that, to the attorney or unrepresented party's `knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,' the pleading is not being presented `primarily for an improper purpose,' the claims, defenses and other legal contentions therein are warranted,' and the allegations and other factual contentions `have evidentiary support.' ( Id., subd.'(b).) If these standards are violated, the court can impose an appropriate sanction sufficient to deter future misconduct, including a monetary sanction. ( Id., subds. (c), (d).)" ( Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 553, 575 , 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 731 , 950 P.2d 1086 .)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.