Gonzalez

People v. Gonzalez

Good Law
149 Cal. App. 4th 304·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 491·2007 Daily Journal DAR 4459·56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 909·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3504
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2007B189988California1,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Salvador Navar Gonzalez appeals a judgment following a guilty plea to failure of a sex offender to file a change of address. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (f)(1).) He contends the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion under section 290, subdivision (g)(2) to declare his offense a misdemeanor. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In . 2001, Gonzalez suffered two separate convictions for annoying or molesting a child under the age of 18 (§ 647.6, subd. (a)), and was ordered to register as a sex offender pursuant to section 290. In 2006, Gonzalez was arrested, and told officers that he had been homeless for two years. The officers discovered that his last annual registration as a sex offender had been in April 2004 when he had been informed that, as a transient, he was required to register every 30 days.

Gonzalez was charged with failure to file a change of address (§ 290, subd. (f)(1)), failure to update his registration annually (§ 290, subd. (a)(1)(C)), failure to update his registration every 30 days (ibid.) and public intoxication (§ 647, subd. (f)). The three section 290 offenses were charged as felonies. In a plea agreement, Gonzalez pleaded guilty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.