Giardino

Giardino v. Brown

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 77·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4161·2002 Daily Journal DAR 5820·98 Cal. App. 4th 820·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4561
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2002B146437California6,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cooper, J.

Daryle Ann Giardino, mother and guardian ad litem of minor Meghann Giardino (interchangeably plaintiff), appeals following summary judgment for defendant Bart Brown doing business as Yosemite Equestrian Services, Inc. (YES). Plaintiff was seriously injured while at Girl Scout camp and claims that YES was at least partially liable because it supplied to the camp a horse, Quarter, inappropriate for inexperienced riders like plaintiff. Finding no bar by the doctrine of assumption of the risk and that a material issue of fact exists, we shall reverse the summary judgment.

Procedural History

The complaint

The gravamen of plaintiff’s operative first amended complaint, relating to YES, was that defendants “negligently furnished to plaintiff a horse for instruction which was dangerous and not suited for Plaintiff’s skill level. Defendants knew or should have known of such dangerous propensity and that the horse was unsuitable for Plaintiff, as an inexperienced equestrian,[ ] and yet defendants negligently furnished such horse to plaintiff without warning Plaintiff of such propensity.” She allegedly was an “inexperienced and unskilled rider, incapable of riding any horse other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.