Wolf

Huskinson & Brown v. Wolf

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 479·98 Cal. App. 4th 113
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2002B147298California4,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mervyn H. Wolf and the law firm Appell & Wolf (collectively, Wolf) appeal from a judgment in favor of another law firm, Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership (Huskinson & Brown). Huskinson & Brown sued Wolf to recover a referral fee from a lawsuit which Huskinson & Brown referred to Wolf. The referral fee was calculated as a portion of Wolfs fees from the referred suit. Although the client in the referred suit did not consent in writing to the fee sharing agreement, as required by Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 2-200 (rule 2-200), the trial court found that Wolf would be unjustly enriched if permitted to keep the portion of the fee it had agreed to pay to Huskinson & Brown. The trial court alternatively allowed recovery of the cost of services rendered and expenses paid by Huskinson & Brown under quantum meruit and a common count for monies owed. Wolf argues that it was error to allow recovery under unjust enrichment or quantum meruit because the client did not consent in writing. We agree and reduce the judgment to the expenses actually paid by Huskinson & Brown.

We treat this case as an appeal on the judgment roll, since it reaches us based only on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.