California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Golden Valley Unified School District

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 642·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4102·2002 Daily Journal DAR 5225·98 Cal. App. 4th 369·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4128
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2002F037363California6,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ardaiz, J.

The California Teachers Association (CTA) and Tiffani Curran (Curran) filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate after Curran was informed in a letter dated August 3, 1999, that she would not be employed as a teacher by the Golden Valley Unified School District (Golden Valley) for the 1999-2000 school year. The trial court denied the petition and ruled a teacher with only an emergency permit may not be classified as a probationary employee and, therefore, the statutory procedures of notice and a hearing do not apply to the dismissal of such a teacher.

Curran appealed, contending (1) she was a probationary employee during the 1998-1999 school year who was not given a nonreelection notice under Education Code section 44929.21 and, therefore, was automatically rehired for the following school year; (2) by virtue of her written contract with Golden Valley classifying her as a probationary employee, she was entitled to the statutory procedures applicable to the dismissal of probationary employees; (3) if, alternatively, she should have been classified as a temporary employee instead of a probationary employee, Golden Valley was required to follow the statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.