BAILON

BAILON v. Superior Court

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 360·98 Cal. App. 4th 1331
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2002B156079California7,694 words

Opinion

Opinion

Steve Cooley, District Attorney, Patrick D. Moran and Brentford J. Ferreira, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

Claiming violation of his statutory right to a speedy trial, Armando Bailon, Jr. moved to dismiss his misdemeanor case. The trial court denied the motion, and the Appellate Division of the Superior Court denied Bailon's subsequent writ petition to that court challenging the trial court's ruling. In this court, Bailon now seeks a writ of mandate directing the Appellate Division to vacate its prior order and directing that court to issue a new order compelling the trial court to dismiss the misdemeanor case against Bailon. We issued an order to show cause, and after considering the briefing and oral argument from Bailon and the People, we grant the writ petition.

Bailon was cited for a misdemeanor violation of Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (a), driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. On November 7, 2001, after he was appointed counsel and while he was free on his own recognizance, Bailon was arraigned and entered a not guilty plea. On November 21, Bailon "waive[d] statutory time," but requested a trial date of December…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.