Mayer

Mayer v. C.W. Driver

Bad Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 535·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4043·2002 Daily Journal DAR 4789·98 Cal. App. 4th 48·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3813
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2002B114327California5,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

In 1984 and 1985, respondents C.W. Driver, a partnership, and C.W. Driver, Inc., a corporation (collectively Driver) constructed an apartment building in Orange County for Huntington Breakers Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership (HBAL). At the time, appellant Joseph Mayer III (Mr. . Mayer) was a general partner of HBAL, and appellant Eleanor C. Mayer, his wife (Mrs. Mayer), was-a limited partner. In 1985 Driver stopped work and sued HBAL and Mr. Mayer individually as general partner for payment of money due and foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien (the Driver action). HBAL, the Mayers, and other partners cross-complained for construction defects. In 1986 HBAL assigned its rights in “the lawsuit” (the then pending Driver action) “and all successor and replacement actions and suits” to the individual partners, but in the same document those individual partners appointed another entity, Huntington Breakers Managing Partnership (HBMP), irrevocably and coupled with an interest, as their attomey-in-fact having authority to take all actions in connection with “the lawsuit.”

The dispute was submitted to arbitration under the terms of the construction contract.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.