Conservatorship of Schaeffer.

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 547·98 Cal. App. 4th 159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 2002B152203California2,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant Lillian Schaeffer's petition for removal of the conservator of the person and *Page 161 the estate of her husband, Malvern Schaeffer, and for appointment of herself as successor conservator. The sole issue on appeal concerns a report made by the conservatee's appointed counsel. Prior to ruling on the petitions, the court read and considered the report, but neither Mrs. Schaeffer nor her counsel were permitted to review the report. Mrs. Schaeffer contends that her due process rights were thus violated. We agree. Factual and Procedural Summary 1 In March of 2000, Mrs. Schaeffer filed petitions for appointment of a temporary conservator and conservator of the person and the estate of her husband. She asked that she be appointed conservator. (Prob. Code, § 1820 ) With the petitions, she submitted a declaration: she and her husband had been married for 49 years, his health and mental condition had declined, and he had put all community funds into his control, so that she had difficulty paying his nursing home fees and attending to investments. Mrs. Schaeffer also submitted a capacity declaration in which a psychologist opined that Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.