Cox

Cox v. Superior Court

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 45·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4133·2002 Daily Journal DAR 5615·98 Cal. App. 4th 670·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4424
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2002B156424California2,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this case we hold that in a trial for medical malpractice, while evidence that plaintiff is receiving disability insurance benefits is admissible under Civil Code section 3333.1, evidence of the tax treatment of those benefits is not.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Plaintiff Kerry C. Cox is a board-certified ophthalmologist. In February 1996, Dr. Clarence L. Shields performed surgery on plaintiff’s shoulder. After surgery, plaintiff experienced substantial pain in his neck and shoulder, and loss of dexterity in his right hand. Further examination revealed he had a “non-union” clavicle fracture. The fracture did not heal on its own. Plaintiff had a bone graft to attempt to alleviate the problem, but his symptoms continued. He was unable to continue working, and sold his ophthalmology practice. He receives approximately $180,000 a year from disability policies. Because he paid the premiums for these policies with after-tax dollars, the disability benefits he receives are currently not taxed as income.

Plaintiff brought this action for legal malpractice against Dr. Shields and the Kerlan Jobe Orthopedic Institute; his wife, Kathy Cox, sued for loss of consortium. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.