MARCUS W. v. Superior Court

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 919·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4046·2002 Daily Journal DAR 4785·98 Cal. App. 4th 36·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3811
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2002A097679California4,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marchiano, J.

By timely petition (Ramona R. v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 802, 804, fn. 1 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 204 , 693 P.2d 789 ]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1483 (j)), Marcus W. seeks a writ of mandate to reverse an order of the juvenile court finding that he is “not a fit and proper subject to be dealt with under the juvenile court law” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 707, subd. (c)) and transferring the case to criminal court. (§§ 707.01, subd. (a)(3)(B), 707.1, subd. (a).) Among his challenges to the order, Marcus contends that the court improperly relied on his confession of involvement to police to find a prima facie case that at age 15 he committed the charged offense of murder, without holding a hearing to determine whether his statements were involuntary and coerced. Consequently, Marcus bore the burden to prove that he was amenable to treatment as a juvenile under all of the criteria enumerated in section 707, subdivision (c). The juvenile court found him unfit under only one—the circumstances and gravity of the offense—proved solely by his admissions to police.

We hold that where, as here, incriminatory statements are offered to establish a prima facie case that a minor committed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.