Pebworth

Pebworth v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832·116 Cal. App. 4th 913
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2004B169982California1,626 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coffee, J.

An employee, joined by his employer, petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, finding that amendments to Labor Code section 4646, effective January 1, 2003, do not apply to injuries occurring before the effective date of the amendments. The amendments change prior law by permitting an employee and employer to settle prospective vocational rehabilitation services for a lump sum not to exceed $10,000. We vacate and remand.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. Petitioner Clarence Pebworth sustained a specific industrial injury in 1997 and a cumulative industrial injury from 1985 to August 20, 2003. In a Compromise and Release approved by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) in November 2002, the parties settled all issues except vocational rehabilitation benefits.

On January 23, 2003, Pebworth and his employer submitted a stipulation to the rehabilitation unit (RU), agreeing to settle vocational rehabilitation compensation for a lump sum payment of $10,000 pursuant to section 4646, subdivision (b). The RU rejected the stipulation on the ground that the statute applies only to injuries occurring after January 1, 2003. Both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.