Hanshaw

Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'n

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 357·116 Cal. App. 4th 471·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 252·2004 Daily Journal DAR 2760·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1905
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2004C041796California4,723 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrison, J.

In Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Assn. (July 31, 1997, C023486) a nonpublished opinion (Hanshaw I), we upheld a judgment awarding various property owners (collectively, Hanshaw) a private road easement south to Long Valley Road (the road); whether they could use the road itself was not adjudicated. Hanshaw then sued an association of the landholders along the road, defendant Long Valley Road Association (LVRA), alleging the road had become a public road by virtue of public use and dedication; he also alleged a prescriptive easement.

The trial court rejected the prescriptive easement theory, but found the road had become public, notwithstanding Nevada County’s refusal to accept an offer to dedicate the road pursuant to California’s Subdivision Map Act. (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq. (the Act).) We agree with the trial court that a failure to complete a statutory dedication does not negate the possibility of a common law dedication. We conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that such a dedication took place. We also conclude that Civil Code section 1009—which allows a landowner to open land for public recreational use without fear of an implied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.