Harrison

Harrison v. Welch

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92·116 Cal. App. 4th 1084·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 331·2004 Daily Journal DAR 3285·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2265
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 2004C044320California5,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In 1994, defendant Denese Welch built a woodshed and placed some landscaping on her property that partially encroached on the vacant lot next door. When plaintiffs Clark and Dana Harrison purchased the vacant lot in 2001, they had the property line surveyed and discovered the encroachment. The Harrisons brought this action to quiet their title to the lot and to enjoin Welch’s encroachment. In response, Welch sought to establish title to the encroachment area by adverse possession or a prescriptive easement to maintain the woodshed and the landscaping. She also contended the Harrisons’ suit was barred by the statute of limitations.

The trial court rejected Welch’s claims to title by adverse possession and a prescriptive easement, but agreed the Harrisons were “time barred from obtaining a mandatory injunction requiring the immediate removal of the encroachments.” Nevertheless, the trial court determined it could grant equitable relief to the Harrisons based on Welch’s claim for equitable relief in her cross-complaint. The court determined the trees planted on the Harrisons’ property belonged to the Harrisons, and although the court allowed Welch to keep a buried sprinkler…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.