Ocean View Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Montecito Water District

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 451·116 Cal. App. 4th 396·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 247·2004 Daily Journal DAR 2738·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1842
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2004B162920California1,842 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A water district wishes to cover a reservoir. It issues a mitigated negative declaration (MND). The MND fails to identify and discuss significant environmental impacts. A homeowners association brings a writ of mandate to compel the water district to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for its project. The trial court denies the petition.

Here we hold, among other things, mitigation measures taken after a MND is issued do not satisfy the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.) requirements. We reverse.

FACTS

The Ortega Reservoir is located in the Santa Barbara County community of Summerland. It provides potable water for, among other entities, the Montecito Water District (District). The District is responsible for maintaining the reservoir’s water quality. The Department of Health Services has encouraged the District to cover the reservoir to prevent water quality problems. In 1998, the District decided to cover the four-acre reservoir with an aluminum roof.

The District, as the lead agency for the purposes of environmental review, ordered an initial study of the project’s environmental impacts. The study found flooding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.