ALICIA B. v. Superior Court

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·116 Cal. App. 4th 856·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 297·2004 Daily Journal DAR 3024·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2095
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 2004D043320California3,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

The San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) took newborn Christopher K. into protective custody after his mother, Alicia B., admitted she used methamphetamine in the week before delivery and he tested positive for alcohol. The juvenile court denied reunification services and set a permanent planning hearing.

Alicia seeks writ review. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 366.26, subd. (l); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 39.IB.) She claims the court erred by not placing Christopher with Susan S., his maternal grandmother, and by finding the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (the ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) did not apply. We issued an order to show cause, HHSA responded, and the parties waived oral argument. We review the petition on the merits and deny it.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In July 2003 Alicia gave birth to Christopher, her sixth child. She admitted methamphetamine use the week before and the day before delivery. Alicia tested positive for methamphetamine, and Christopher tested positive for ethanol (alcohol).

On July 22 HHSA filed a petition on Christopher’s behalf, alleging Alicia’s substance abuse rendered her unable to provide regular care for him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.