Anthony

Anthony v. Snyder

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 505·116 Cal. App. 4th 643·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 273·2004 Daily Journal DAR 2865
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2004D041676California10,770 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

In this action for a writ of mandate and injunctive relief, petitioner and respondent Garner Anthony (Anthony) sought an order requiring the respondents below, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego (the County or the Board) and the County’s Director of Public Works, John Snyder (the director of public works; collectively the County appellants) to require the real party in interest below, Barratt American Incorporated (Barratt), to make certain improvements to a street adjoining Anthony’s property in connection with a development being created by Barratt. In 1996 and 2001, the County approved tentative and final subdivision maps and entered into a related subdivision improvement agreement with Barratt for the completion of certain infrastructure improvements. The trial court ruled in favor of Anthony on his petition, directing the County appellants and Barratt to require and accomplish the requested improvements to Via Maria Elena (VME), a private road serving as a primary access road to the 28-unit residential development being constructed by Barratt, to the minimum improvement level required by the County Standards for Private Streets (rev. Apr. 1982)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.