Puluc-Sique

People v. Puluc-Sique

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365·182 Cal. App. 4th 894·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 302
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2010A123451California2,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

Needham, J.

An appellate court possesses the inherent power to dismiss the appeal of a criminal defendant who is a fugitive from justice. In this case, the People ask us to extend the appellate disentitlement doctrine to a defendant who has been deported from this country by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). We conclude that absent additional circumstances not presented here, a defendant who has been deported does not stand in the same shoes as one who has voluntarily placed himself beyond the court’s control. We therefore deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant Elver Bernardino Puluc-Sique pled no contest to possession of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) He was granted probation with drug treatment conditions under Proposition 36. (Pen. Code, § 1210.1; see generally Gardner v. Schwarzenegger (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1366 , 1369-1371 [ 101 Cal.Rptr.3d 229 ].) Defendant filed a timely appeal from the judgment granting him probation and has submitted an opening brief in which he argues that the minute order from the sentencing hearing must be amended because it contains probation conditions not orally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.