Bernard

Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. v. Bernard

Bad Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 16·182 Cal. App. 4th 60·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 214
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2010B207865California4,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Russel S. Bernard appeals from the trial court’s judgment confirming an arbitration award against him. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Respondents Howard Marks and Bruce Karsh and others formed respondent Oaktree Capital Management, L.R (Oaktree), in 1995, a real estate investment hedge fund. Oaktree established limited partnerships called “funds,” which it marketed to outside investors. A few months after Oaktree’s creation, appellant Russel S. Bernard joined it to manage its funds.

Oaktree charged its investors two types of fees: management fees and incentive fees. Oaktree calculated its management fees as a percentage of total assets under the control of each of its funds. A second fee Oaktree charged its investors was an incentive fee, also called “carried interest.” Oaktree collected an incentive fee when a particular fund reached a specified performance benchmark calibrated to encourage managers such as appellant, who received a share of the fee, to achieve superior returns for Oaktree’s investors.

In November 2005, appellant resigned from Oaktree. Shortly afterward, he announced his formation of a private equity real estate fund named Westport Capital Partners…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.