Schwarzenegger

ST. JOHN'S WELL CHILD & FAMILY CENTER v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108·182 Cal. App. 4th 590
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2010A125750California12,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, Robin B. Johansen, James C. Harrison, Thomas A. Willis, Karen Getman and Margaret R. Prinzing for Interveners.

The current economic downturn affects all Californians, but those suffer most who receive essential health and welfare assistance from agencies dependent upon state tax revenues. The needs of such vulnerable citizens so exceed the state's diminished ability to pay for them that "Sophie's choices" are presented. Government must choose between and among equally needy groups, knowing those not favored will be devastated. The responsible decision makers are the Legislature and the Governor. In the context of the constitutionally prescribed budget process, the power of the purse—i.e., the power to appropriate public funds—belongs only to the Legislature. With respect to a bill containing appropriations, the Governor can only sign or veto the measure in its entirety or "reduce or eliminate one or more items of appropriation." (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 10, subd. (e).) The question in this case is whether the Governor exceeded these limited powers.

In this original writ proceeding, we consider constitutional challenges to the Governor's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.