Mendoza

Mendoza v. Ramos

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853·182 Cal. App. 4th 680·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 288
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2010B211969California1,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

After his petition to modify custody led to a change in child support payments, appellant Hector Mendoza appealed, claiming that, for purposes of determining child support, income should be attributed to respondent Sara Ramos. Ramos is a recipient of CalWORKs (California Work Opportunities and Responsibility to Kids), in compliance with the terms of that program. The trial court properly declined to attribute income to her.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mendoza and Ramos are the parents of four children, all of whom were minors at the time of the proceedings in the trial court. Although they never married, paternity was established in 2001, the parties stipulated to a custody order in 2003, and the court entered judgment ordering Mendoza to pay child support of $297 per month in July 2005.

In February 2007, Mendoza sought to modify the custody and support orders, asserting that the children in fact spent the majority of their time with him, and wished to continue to do so, although the custody order placed the children with him only 50 percent of the time. Ramos opposed the modification, and asserted that Mendoza was in arrears in payments, and wished to terminate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.