Acuna

People Ex Rel. Reisig v. Acuna

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 560·182 Cal. App. 4th 866·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 301
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2010C059375California10,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

Plaintiff, the District Attorney of Yolo County, initiated this action against the Broderick Boys, an alleged criminal street gang, and 23 of its members to enjoin as a public nuisance their activities in a 2.98-square-mile area of the City of West Sacramento. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants appeal. We conclude sufficient, credible evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion the Broderick Boys is a criminal street gang whose activities have created a public nuisance in the designated area. However, we further conclude two provisions of the preliminary injunction, one dealing with controlled substances and the other dealing with the consumption of alcoholic beverages, are unenforceable. We therefore reverse as to those provisions but otherwise affirm the order.

Facts and Proceedings

Plaintiff filed the original complaint in this action on December 30, 2004, against the Broderick Boys and Does 1 through 400 and obtained a preliminary injunction by default. Later, plaintiff dismissed the Doe defendants and obtained a permanent injunction against the Broderick Boys alone, also by default. Several individuals moved to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.