Wilson

Wilson v. Superior Court

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122·182 Cal. App. 4th 1457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2010B216212California7,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1459 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1460 OPINION The Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA) (Welf. Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) 1 authorizes the state to identify individuals who suffer from mental disorders that predispose them to commit violent sexual crimes and to confine and treat them until they no longer threaten society. ( People v. Allen (2008) 44 Cal.4th 843 , 857 [ 80 Cal.Rptr.3d 183 , 187 P.3d 1018 ] ( Allen ).) A proceeding under the SVPA is civil in nature and, although it may result in the involuntary commitment of the defendant, is not equivalent to a criminal prosecution. ( Allen , at pp. 860-861 .) Nonetheless, because it involves a significant deprivation of liberty, a defendant in an SVPA proceeding is entitled to due process protections. ( Allen , at p. 862 ; see People v. McKee (2010) 47…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.