Diaz

Diaz v. Carcamo

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 306·182 Cal. App. 4th 339
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2010B211127California5,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 341 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 342 OPINION Dawn Renae Diaz was seriously injured when she was struck by a car that had jumped a freeway center divider following its collision with a truck. She sued Karen Tagliaferri, 1 the driver of the car that struck her, and *Page 343 Jose Carcamo, the driver of the truck with which Tagliaferri collided. Diaz also sued Carcamo's employer, Sugar Transport, alleging it was vicariously liable as Carcamo's employer. She further alleged that Sugar Transport was liable for its independent negligence in its hiring and retention of Carcamo. The jury returned a verdict against each defendant awarding plaintiff a total of $22,566,373 in damages. Pursuant to Proposition 51 2 it apportioned fault among Tagliaferri, Carcamo, and Sugar Transport. Appellant, Sugar Transport,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.