Schrader

Schrader v. Scott

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 433·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1040·8 Cal. App. 4th 1679·92 Daily Journal DAR 11913·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7350
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 1992E008908California3,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs John L. Schrader and Joy A. Schrader (plaintiffs) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of defendants Jack C. Scott, Jack C. Scott, a professional corporation, Donald L. Rogers, Donald L. Rogers, a professional corporation, Richard D. Anderson, Dennis H. Malody II, Dennis H. Malody II, a professional corporation, and Rogers, Anderson, Malody and Scott (defendants). Plaintiffs had sued defendants for accountant malpractice, and the judgment was entered following defendants’ successful motion for summary judgment, based on the theory that plaintiffs’ action for malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs contended below, and contend on appeal, that the commencement of the statute of limitations for professional malpractice was tolled while they pursued their administrative remedies challenging adverse tax assessments by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and California Franchise Tax Board (FTB), and that therefore their action is not barred by the statute of limitations.

Facts

Plaintiffs filed their complaint for breach of contract, fraud, and intentional and negligent misrepresentation against defendants on October 23,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.