Jimenez

Jimenez v. Protective Life Insurance

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 326·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 947·8 Cal. App. 4th 528·92 Daily Journal DAR 10585·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6708
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1992E007527California5,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

Defendant Protective Life Insurance Company (Protective) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Manuel Jimenez. Protective contends the trial court erred in granting summary adjudication on the issue of Jimenez’s entitlement to the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of his debtor, Kevin Breton. Protective argues: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in granting a motion for summary adjudication rather than summary judgment; (2) a creditor has an insurable interest in the life of his debtor only in the amount of the debt; (3) in granting the motion for summary adjudication, the trial court erroneously considered facts not set forth in Jimenez’s statement of material facts; (4) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside, on the ground of mistake, Protective’s stipulation for entry of summary adjudication; (5) the trial court made extraneous statements that should be disregarded on appeal; (6) Protective was entitled to summary judgment or summary adjudication, at least as to the bad faith claim; and (7) the award of interest should be reversed. We conclude the trial court erred in granting summary adjudication of issues when the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.