Palmdale Hospital Medical Center v. Department of Health Services

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 926·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1020·8 Cal. App. 4th 1306·92 Daily Journal DAR 11568·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7201
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1992B055961California3,844 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

The California Department of Health Services (Department) appeals from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate. The writ prohibits the Department from altering its final Medi-Cal settlements with plaintiffs Palmdale Hospital Medical Center and Vista Hill Hospital because the Department’s adjustments were made more than three years after the hospitals submitted cost reports. We reach the merits of the case after deciding that the Department is not collaterally estopped from challenging this ruling by a previous adjudication against the Department, on the same issue but in another action involving a different health care facility. On the merits, we conclude that the three-year period in Welfare and Institutions Code section 14170 applies only to the Department’s audit or review of the cost report of a Medi-Cal provider, and is not a general statute of limitations applicable to the final determination of the amount of reimbursement due to the provider. For this reason, the Department was not precluded from adjusting the amount of reimbursement due to the hospitals after the three-year period had expired. We therefore reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.