Matreyek

California Federal Bank v. Matreyek

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 58·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 917·8 Cal. App. 4th 125·92 Daily Journal DAR 10057·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 1992B059760California3,046 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiff and appellant California Federal Bank (CalFed) appeals a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to its original complaint interposed by defendants and respondents Bill Albin Matreyek, as trustee for the Bill Albin Matreyek Trust and Mary Elizabeth Burney Matreyek Trust U/D/T June 9, 1986 (hereafter, the Matreyeks).

The issues presented are whether CalFed has pled or is capable of pleading causes of action for unjust enrichment and equitable subrogation.

For the reasons discussed below, the judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

On December 3, 1990, CalFed filed this action against the Matreyeks for (1) restitution based on unjust enrichment; (2) equitable subrogation; (3) money had and received; and (4) money paid. The complaint alleged, in relevant part:

On June 8, 1988, pursuant to a note secured by a deed of trust, CalFed loaned the Matreyeks $7,060,000, at an annual interest rate of 10.25 percent. The note required monthly payments of $62,047 through July 1, 1995, at which time the entire principal balance then owing would be due. The note further provided the Matreyeks would owe CalFed a prepayment penalty in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.