Robings

Robings v. Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy

Good Law
115 Cal. Rptr. 3d 828·188 Cal. App. 4th 952·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2010B216702California4,353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Herbert Jere Robings, Rick Mullen, Ken Nilsen, the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association, and the Ramirez Canyon Preservation Fund (appellants) appeal from the final amended judgment of the superior court entered May 26, 2009, denying plaintiffs’ challenge to certain acts of defendants Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority, and the respective governing boards of those entities. We find no error and affirm.

Background

The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy

The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Act (the Conservancy Act) became effective as of 1980 and was later amended. (Pub. Resources Code, § 33000 et seq.) The Conservancy Act designated the Santa Monica Mountains Zone, finding it to be “the last large undeveloped area contiguous to the shoreline within the greater Los Angeles metropolitan region, comprised of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties,” and declaring it to be “a unique and valuable economic, environmental, agricultural, scientific, educational, and recreational resource that should be held in trust for present and future generations . . . .” (Pub. Resources Code, § 33001.)

In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.