Huitt

Huitt v. Southern California Gas Co.

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 453·188 Cal. App. 4th 1586·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1743
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2010F056892California7,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cornell, J.

Michael Sean Huitt and Matt Nino (hereafter collectively plaintiffs) were injured while attempting to light a water heater at a construction site (hereafter the school site or school) owned by the Porterville Unified School District (hereafter the school district). After initial attempts to light the water heater’s pilot light failed, Huitt decided to bleed any accumulated air in the natural gas pipe. This action caused natural gas to accumulate in the water heater closet. After Huitt sealed the natural gas line, he again attempted to light the water heater’s pilot light. The accumulated natural gas exploded, resulting in serious injuries to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs filed suit against the Southern California Gas Company (hereafter the Gas Company), alleging that the natural gas that had accumulated in the water heater closet lacked any odorant. Natural gas, in its natural state, is a colorless and odorless gas. Federal regulations require odorant be added to natural gas so that it is detectable by a person with a normal sense of smell. ( 49 C.F.R. § 192.625 (a) (2010).)

The evidence established that the odorant added to natural gas is adsorbed by new steel gas pipes until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.