LAZARIN

LAZARIN v. Superior Court

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 596·188 Cal. App. 4th 1560·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1742
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2010B222807California10,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

Three union-represented construction workers, Richard Lazarin, Gervis Quamina and Otis Skinner, sued their former employer, Total Western, Inc. (TWI), on behalf of themselves and a putative class of former and current nonexempt hourly employees of TWI providing onsite construction services at oil refineries, powerplants or other industrial facilities, alleging in part TWI had failed to provide second meal periods in the manner required by Labor Code section 512, subdivision (a), and section 10(B) of Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage order No. 16-2001 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11160) (wage order 16). In their fifth cause of action the workers seek damages for TWI’s failure to pay premium wages required by section 226.7 to compensate its employees for the missed second meal periods. In their second cause of action the workers allege TWI’s practice of failing to provide the required second meal periods constitutes an unfair and unlawful business practice in violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.

Based on its understanding of the decision by Division Four of this court in Bearden v. U.S. Borax, Inc. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 429 [ 41…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.