Garcia

Garcia v. Four Points Sheraton LAX

Good Law
115 Cal. Rptr. 3d 685·188 Cal. App. 4th 364·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1575·16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1714
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2010B210720, B210716, B210719, B210726, B210730California9,719 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this appeal, we address the validity of the Hotel Service Charge Reform Ordinance (Ordinance) enacted by the City of Los Angeles (the City), requiring nonunionized hotels in the Century Corridor near Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to pass along mandatory service charges to workers who render the services for which the charges have been collected. The Ordinance is based upon the City’s determination that LAX-area hotels reap economic benefits from their location and have the responsibility and ability to pay these workers a decent compensation. Service workers have seen their income decline as a result of the hotels’ practice of imposing mandatory service charges because patrons assume these charges are paid to the workers and therefore do not leave them a gratuity.

Appellants are service workers who challenge the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuits to enforce the Ordinance on the grounds that it is preempted by Labor Code sections 350 through 356, which govern the disposition of gratuities. Appellants contend the Ordinance does not conflict with the Labor Code because it neither contradicts the Labor Code nor enters the field of regulating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.