Maxwell-Jolly

CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSN. v. Maxwell-Jolly

Bad Law
115 Cal. Rptr. 3d 572·188 Cal. App. 4th 559·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1610
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2010A124098California8,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

California Hospital Association (CHA), a trade association representing the interests of California hospitals, appeals from the denial of its petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085), challenging the manner in which the State Department of Health Care Services (the Department) has been paying hospitals that operate distinct part nursing facilities (DP/NF’s) under California’s Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal. CHA claims the Department violated state and federal law, by imposing two separate limitations on the reimbursement rates for skilled nursing services rendered by DP/NF’s to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. We reverse.

L BACKGROUND

A. Statutory Framework

1. Federal Law

Medicaid is a cooperative federal-state program through which the federal government provides financial assistance to states so that they may furnish medical care to needy individuals. ( 42 U.S.C. § 1396 ; Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. (1990) 496 U.S. 498, 502 [ 110 L.Ed.2d 455 , 110 S.Ct. 2510 ]; Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center v. Shewry (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 460, 469 [ 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 639 ] (Mission Hospital).) Although state participation is voluntary, if a state chooses to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.