Sandell

Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc.

Bad Law
115 Cal. Rptr. 3d 453·188 Cal. App. 4th 297·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1558·23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1129
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2010D055549California11,026 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Robert Sandell appeals from a judgment entered after the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Taylor-Listug, Inc. (Taylor-Listug), on Sandell’s claims for disability and age discrimination. Sandell was employed as vice-president of sales at Taylor-Listug, a guitar manufacturer, from 2004 to 2007.

Approximately six months into his employment at Taylor-Listug, Sandell suffered a stroke after receiving a chiropractic adjustment. Sandell returned to work at Taylor-Listug in late 2004. During the remainder of Sandell’s employment at Taylor-Listug, he required a cane to walk, and his speech was noticeably slower than it had been prior to his stroke. Taylor-Listug’s chief executive officer terminated Sandell’s employment in late 2007, a few days after Sandell’s 60th birthday, citing displeasure with Sandell’s performance as vice president of sales.

The trial court concluded that there were no triable issues of fact with respect to Sandell’s discrimination claims, and granted summary judgment in favor of Taylor-Listug. Having reviewed the record presented on summary judgment, we conclude that Sandell presented evidence sufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.