Fenderson

People v. Fenderson

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 17·188 Cal. App. 4th 625·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2010A123984California7,633 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

Marilyn Sibyl Chandler Fenderson was a caregiver for Katherine Majerus, an elderly woman in failing health. After Majerus’s death, Fenderson removed over $300,000 from Majerus’s bank accounts, claiming that Majerus had given her the accounts. A jury convicted her of one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)) and one count of second degree commercial burglary (§§ 459, 460). On appeal, Fenderson contends that her convictions are not supported by substantial evidence and that the individual and cumulative impact of alleged instructional errors requires reversal. Fenderson also argues that recent amendments to section 4019 should be applied retroactively to entitle her to additional presentence custody credits.

In the unpublished portion of our opinion, we agree that the amendments to section 4019 are retroactive and that Fenderson is accordingly entitled to recalculation of her presentence custody credits. Otherwise, we affirm and specifically address in the published portion of our opinion three of Fenderson’s contentions; the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence; the trial court failed to instruct the jury on certain probate code provisions; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.