In Re McClendon

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 315·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1695·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12347·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 278·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9825
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2003A099191, A099293California2,454 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

Petitioner Barney McClendon is serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life for the 1981 murder of his wife, enhanced two years for firearm use in committing the offense. The Governor found that petitioner is unsuitable for parole and reversed a decision of the Board of Prison Terms (Board) approving parole. Petitioner sought judicial review of the Governor’s denial of parole. The superior court found that the Governor’s decision lacked evidentiary support and granted a petition for writ of habeas corpus ordering petitioner’s release on parole. The superior court’s order predated issuance of In re Rosenkrantz, in which our Supreme Court elucidated the standards for reviewing a decision by the Governor finding that a prisoner is unsuitable for parole. (In re Rosenkrantz (2002) 29 Cal.4th 616 [ 128 Cal.Rptr.2d 104 , 59 P.3d 174 ].) Viewed under the proper review standards, the Governor’s decision is supported by the evidence. Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s order releasing petitioner on parole.

L

FACTS

The evidence submitted to the Board, and reviewed by the Governor and the superior court, established that petitioner shot and killed his estranged wife,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.