Maloney

Mercury Casualty Co. v. Maloney

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 799·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1739·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 647·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2003D040282California1,553 words

Opinion

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

In this case, an automobile passenger was injured in an accident and received payment of medical bills under the medical payment provision of an automobile liability policy covering the driver of the car in which she was riding. The issue presented is whether the passenger is obligated to reimburse the insurer, as required under the policy, for the amount of such payments from proceeds she received in settling her claims against another driver legally responsible for the accident. We conclude that the passenger, as a third party beneficiary of the insurance policy, is required to comply with the conditions set forth in the insurance policy regarding medical expense benefits and thus is obligated to reimburse the insurer.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Sharia Rae Maloney was a passenger in a car driven by Denise Poppert when the car was rear-ended in a multiple vehicle accident. Maloney, who did not have any medical insurance, suffered injuries as a result of the accident and within a year of the incident incurred $4,411.35 in medical bills for treatment of those injuries. Poppert’s insurer, Mercury Casualty Company (Mercury), paid Maloney’s medical bills pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.