AI Credit Corp. v. Aguilar & Sebastinelli

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 1072·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1778·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12988·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 813·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10341
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2003A101841California3,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

Aguilar & Sebastinelli (Aguilar) is a law firm, which represented A.I. Credit Corp., Inc. (AICCI) in a collection action against Richard W. Peterson (Peterson). It appeals from a summary judgment in a separate declaratory relief action regarding Aguilar’s right to attorney fees in the collection action. The judgment was entered on the basis that Aguilar’s claim for legal fees against AICCI was barred because the court disqualified Aguilar from representing AICCI in its collection action against Peterson. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The underlying actions arise out of an unsatisfied judgment in favor of AICCI against Peterson, entered in 1995. Pillsbury Madison & Sutro (Pillsbury) represented AICCI in that action. AICCI collected a portion of the judgment. Between June 1997 and June 2000, AICCI made no attempts to collect the remaining portion of the judgment, which totaled approximately $675,000.

For “several years” prior to 1993, Aguilar was “general, business and claims counsel” to Peterson and “several entities associated with [Peterson].” During that time, Peterson owned AAMB Insurance Agency, Inc., “had an interest” in American Emerald Insurance Company, “was [a]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.