Glasper

People v. Glasper

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 1104·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1781·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12991·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 4·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10349
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2003H023404California4,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

A jury found defendants Troy Edward Morgan, Charles Edward Glasper, and Julie Ann Glasper guilty of transporting cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)]). Defendants also had been charged with possession of cocaine base for sale (§ 11351.5); Troy was acquitted of this count, while Charles and Julie were found guilty of a lesser-included offense, possession of cocaine base (§ 11350). Troy and Julie were found guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia (§ 11364), and Charles and Julie were found guilty of being under the influence of a controlled substance (§ 11550, subd. (a)). The jury found true an allegation that Charles was on bail when he committed the instant offenses (Pen. Code, § 12022.1) , and Charles admitted he had suffered a prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i); 1170.12), he had a previous drug conviction (§§ 11370, subd. (c), 11370.2), and he had served a prior prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). Julie also admitted having suffered a prior strike conviction. The trial court sentenced Charles to 11 years in state prison. It suspended imposition of sentence as to Troy and Julie and placed them on probation upon condition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.