Taylor

Taylor v. John Crane, Inc.

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 1063·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1772·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12845·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 695·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10307
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2003A098044, A098587California3,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

Defendant John Crane Inc., appeals a jury verdict in favor ofplaintiffs David Taylor (Taylor) and his wife Susan Taylor, based on Taylor’s exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured by defendant. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, contending the jury should not have allocated fault to the United States Navy in calculating defendant’s proportionate share of fault. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Taylor served in the Navy as a machinist mate from 1962 to 1971 and again from 1973 to 1976. He worked for the Union Pacific Railroad for approximately six months in the period between his Navy enlistments. He was in the naval reserve from 1976 through 1986. He stopped working in February 2001 because of ill health. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma and the same month was told his life expectancy was a matter of weeks or months.

A. Taylor’s Work in the Navy

Taylor testified at trial that, among his other duties as a machinist mate on Navy submarines and surface ships, he performed maintenance on valves (which regulate the flow of steam and fluids through pipes) and flanges (the joints between pipe sections). His work on valves…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.