Paterno

Paterno v. State

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 998·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 854
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2003C040553California13,289 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrison, J.

The environmental aftermath of the Gold Rush continues to plague California. Hydraulic mining debris caused flooding which led to the building of levees at the confluence of the Yuba and Feather Rivers. Almost a century ago the Linda levee was built with uncompacted mining debris, and the use of that debris caused the levee to collapse on February 20, 1986.

About 3,000 plaintiffs sued the State of California (State), Reclamation District 784 (District) and others not now parties, seeking damages. In Paterno v. State of California (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 68 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 754 ] (Paterno I), we affirmed a defense jury verdict finding no dangerous condition of public property and reversed an inverse condemnation liability finding against defendants, and remanded for another trial on inverse liability. A new coordination judge (Hon. John J. Golden), conducted a lengthy court trial and issued a defense judgment against sample plaintiffs (collectively, Paterno) who filed this appeal.

Paterno embraces Judge Golden’s factual findings, which in his view, create inverse liability on the part of the State as a matter of law. We agree. When a public entity operates a flood control…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.