Bay

Bay v. Superior Court

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 829·7 Cal. App. 4th 1022·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 339·92 Daily Journal DAR 8962
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1992F016929California2,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ardaiz, J.

Statement of Case

As part of an investigation that petitioner was practicing law without a license and was obtaining funds by false pretenses, Investigator Ray Cereghino of the Fresno County District Attorney’s Office sought a search warrant for petitioner’s apartment. Because of the nature of the petition before this court, the background facts are not particularly well developed; however, from the moving papers of both parties we glean that the magistrate issued a search warrant based upon the affidavit of Investigator Cereghino. Apparently, because of concerns about lawyer/client privilege regarding communications from individuals who may have believed petitioner was an attorney, the magistrate appointed Samuel C. Palmer III to serve as a special master in the case. Investigator Cereghino served the search warrant and Special Master Palmer conducted the search. Following the seizure of numerous documents, petitioner filed a suppression motion on the ground the search warrant was overbroad. The motion was denied and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order denying his motion and to enter a new and different order granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.