Smith v. County of Santa Barbara

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 806·7 Cal. App. 4th 770·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 120·92 Daily Journal DAR 8603·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 1992B058763California2,070 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

After a public hearing, the County of Santa Barbara (County) found that it issued a land use permit in error, but that it was estopped from revoking the permit. The superior court denied a petition for a writ of administrative mandate to require the County to revoke the permit.

We hold that a public entity may be estopped from enforcing the law only in extraordinary cases. This case is not one of them. There is no substantial evidence to support the County’s finding of reasonable reliance on the land use permit. We reverse.

Facts

Several businesses have erected communication facilities on Gibralter Peak in Santa Barbara County. The land is zoned for single family residences, but communications facilities are allowed as a conditional use.

In 1984 a conditional use permit was granted to “Comsite/Bud-North Shore, Inc.” to build “FM.and TV Facilities” on a Gibralter Peak parcel. The permit made no reference to microwave or telephone communications.

Thereafter TMC Communications wanted to build a telephone microwave station on the parcel. TMC hired Raymond Yount, a former County employee familiar with County zoning regulations, to help it apply for the permits.

Instead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.