Warren

Warren v. Schecter

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 759·57 Cal. App. 4th 1189·67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 573·97 Daily Journal DAR 12198·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7596
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1997B096771California6,254 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Defendant and appellant Lawrence Schecter, M.D. (Dr. Schecter) appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Janet Warren (Warren) following a jury trial of a medical malpractice action arising out of a failure to obtain informed consent to surgery.

The issues presented include Warren’s entitlement to calendar preference on appeal, whether her action against Dr. Schecter was time-barred, and the damages recoverable for the failure to obtain informed consent.

We conclude, inter alia: Warren’s medical condition entitles her to calendar preference on appeal (see Code Civ. Proc., § 36; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 19.3); Warren’s action which was filed within one year of the manifestation of the undisclosed complication of bone disease was timely (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5; Cobbs v. Grant (1972) 8 Cal.3d 229, 240-241 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 505 , 502 P.2d 1 ]); the trial court properly instructed the jury Warren was required to prove a reasonably prudent person in her position would have refused the surgery if adequately informed of the perils (Cobbs, supra, at p. 245 ; BAJI No. 6.11 (8th ed. 1994)); and Warren is entitled to compensation for all damages proximately resulting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.