Sacks

Sacks v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.

Caution
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 821·7 Cal. App. 4th 950·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 306·92 Daily Journal DAR 8844
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 1992B058585California4,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

After purchasing a house located at 3009 Vista Crest Drive in Los Angeles for $295,000, appellant Stephen E. Sacks sued the sellers (Jay and Joan Morgenstern) and respondents FSR Brokerage, Inc. (doing business as Fred Sands Realtors), Glen Gaither and Richard Beck. Respondents Gaither and Beck were the salespersons for respondent FSR Brokerage, Inc. Sacks’s complaint alleged that the 75-year-old house he purchased came with a defective foundation, inadequate or defective plumbing and heating, and no insulation. The complaint asserted causes of action for fraud, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligence and intentional infliction of mental distress. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment against Sacks.

Because the trial court properly found Sacks had sufficient notice of the motion, because Sacks failed in the trial court to argue the merits of the motion, and because Sacks was not prejudiced by the death of respondent Gaither, we affirm the judgment.

Procedural Facts

On March 12, 1991, respondents filed a motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, for summary adjudication of issues and noticed the hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.