Estate of Malpas

Good Law
7 Cal. App. 4th 1901·9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 806
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1992H008602California3,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1903 OPINION Unless either the decedent or federal law otherwise directs, both federal and California estate tax "shall be equitably prorated among the persons interested in the estate" in the manner prescribed in Probate Code sections 20110 through 20117. (Prob. Code, § 20110 ) We are called upon to review the construction and application of Probate Code section 20113 , which states that "[i]f a trust is created, or other provision made whereby a person is given an interest in the income of, an estate for years or for life in, or other temporary interest in, any property, the estate tax on both the temporary interest and on the remainder thereafter shall be charged against and paid out of the corpus of the property without apportionment between remainders and temporary estates." By a will which contained no specific direction for proration of estate taxes, a decedent gave a life estate in a house to a 68-year-old friend and permitted the remainder to fall, with other assets, into an estate residue to be *Page 1904 held in trust for certain of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.